The aim of the study was to analyze retention protocols and materials for fixed retainers used by clinicians providing orthodontic treatment in Poland. The survey was carried out from February to April 2021. The questionnaire was designed using the Google Forms tool. After validation, the questionnaire was delivered to verified active orthodontists gathered in a closed social media group of 615 members. Finally, 104 answers were received. Answers to individual questions were provided in percentages and tabularized. A chi-squared test of proportion was used to compare: the proportion of clinicians using retainers of different characteristics and the proportions of clinicians indicating the superiority of a given clinical solution. Rectangular steel braided wire was rated as most reliable. However, doctors who declared to use gold chain were mostly solely using this type of wire. Multistranded round wire was rated the worst. Fiber-reinforced composite was mainly used in periodontal patients. The protocols used by Polish orthodontic practitioners relied on double long-term retention with regular follow-up. The most popular material was stainless steel braided rectangular wire bonded with a flowable composite. Most clinicians believed they could maintain the treatment results, but they declared that patients’ cooperation was a challenge.

Orthodontic retention—Protocols and materials—A questionnaire pilot study among Polish practitioners / Jedliński, Maciej; Mazur, Marta; Schmeidl, Krzysztof; Grocholewicz, Katarzyna; Ardan, Roman; Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna. - In: MATERIALS. - ISSN 1996-1944. - 15:2(2022). [10.3390/ma15020666]

Orthodontic retention—Protocols and materials—A questionnaire pilot study among Polish practitioners

Mazur, Marta
Secondo
;
2022

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze retention protocols and materials for fixed retainers used by clinicians providing orthodontic treatment in Poland. The survey was carried out from February to April 2021. The questionnaire was designed using the Google Forms tool. After validation, the questionnaire was delivered to verified active orthodontists gathered in a closed social media group of 615 members. Finally, 104 answers were received. Answers to individual questions were provided in percentages and tabularized. A chi-squared test of proportion was used to compare: the proportion of clinicians using retainers of different characteristics and the proportions of clinicians indicating the superiority of a given clinical solution. Rectangular steel braided wire was rated as most reliable. However, doctors who declared to use gold chain were mostly solely using this type of wire. Multistranded round wire was rated the worst. Fiber-reinforced composite was mainly used in periodontal patients. The protocols used by Polish orthodontic practitioners relied on double long-term retention with regular follow-up. The most popular material was stainless steel braided rectangular wire bonded with a flowable composite. Most clinicians believed they could maintain the treatment results, but they declared that patients’ cooperation was a challenge.
2022
fixed retention; orthodontic materials; clinicians’ preferences; retention wire; Polish orthodontist; retention protocol; retainer; orthodontic retainer; stainless-steel wire; gold chain
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Orthodontic retention—Protocols and materials—A questionnaire pilot study among Polish practitioners / Jedliński, Maciej; Mazur, Marta; Schmeidl, Krzysztof; Grocholewicz, Katarzyna; Ardan, Roman; Janiszewska-Olszowska, Joanna. - In: MATERIALS. - ISSN 1996-1944. - 15:2(2022). [10.3390/ma15020666]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Jedlinski_Orthodontic-retention_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/2/666
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.03 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1603945
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact